The European Union (EU) is under attack from all sides.
Will the EU strike back?
The most serious threat against Europe is the dislocation of the world system of security and defense, which Europe relies on as a protection. During the past two years, an avalanche of steps taken by the US is unraveling the Atlantic-dominated frameworkwith a possible US pull-back from NATO; a hasty and sloppy departure of US troops from Syria in December 2018 putting the European allies in front of the fait accompli; breaking away from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) in February 2019 (immediately followed by Russia doing the same thing the next day.)
The noxious transatlantic relations came to light during the Munich Security Conference (MSC), February 15-17, an annual event, since 1963, attended by the decision-makers of the world. Angela Merkel was the voice of many worried Europeans. The contrast between her speech and US vice president Mike Pence’s was striking.
Without a script, the German chancellor made a passionate plea for multilateralism, clearly pointing at the US, Russia and China to save the world order which she sees in danger of decline and destruction.
She received a standing ovation.
After her spirited performance, the US Vice President’s words sounded leaden. “He admonished Europeans the way Brejhnev did the Iron Curtain countries back in the USSR days,” commented a French analyst. Pence’s speech was met with an icy reception. There was an incredible moment when he brought Donald Trump’s greetings.
An interminable and deafening silence followed. He clearly was expecting applause from the audience.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov proposed to prolong the New START (Strategic Arms Reduction) Treaty after 2021. This treaty – limiting the number of long-range nuclear missiles- is one of the last remaining from the cold war era.
Sylvie Kauffman, editorial writer for Le Monde, commented, “The Europeans feel left out in the cold, tetanized by the major powers working out a system above their heads.” Sigmar Gabriel, former German minister of foreign affairs, wrote, “In a world of carnivorous geopolitics, the Europeans are the last vegetarians. After the departure of the UK, we will become vegans, then prey.”
One way to attack and therefore weaken Europe is to capitalize on the fact that it is divided. Some foreign powers have become quite adept at using the “Trojan horse” strategy.
On Feb. 13-14, the US and Israel chose Poland as the location of a conference on the Middle East. In Warsaw they were able to meet with the other members of the Visegrad group (V4) — Hungary, Slovakia and Czech Republic. These four countries are run by populist and authoritarian governments and clear in their intention to unravel the EU as it exists today. There was little media coverage here about the conference, which was by-passing Brussels. Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs, was not even present.
Steve Bannon, former advisor of Donald Trump is busy traveling all over Europe, giving his support to populist countries like Italy and Hungary. He proclaims that Brexit is a great thing and advocates the creation of a possible axis through Rome/Budapest/Warsaw to counter the Franco-German “couple”. He has purchased a monastery near Rome and turned it into a training center for “sovereignists.”
Europe represents a juicy market of over 700 millions inhabitants. It is particularly vulnerable because it continues to respect some rules, which are disregarded elsewhere. The most striking illustration of unfair competition is the recent failure of the fusion of the two European railroad magnates Alstom and Siemens. The EU Commissioner for competition, Margrethe Vestager, stopped the process lest it violates the antitrust rule, a rather outdated notion when one considers the size of the giant telecommunications companies in the US. The danger for Europe is that this decision in Brussels leaves the way wide open for China.
China is by far the main predator trying to wedge its way into Europe, hiding under a charming euphemism of “silk road” (the Chinese call it also the “Belt and Road Initiative.”) The investments of Xi Jinping’s government have increased in leaps and bonds to reach a peak in 2016, particularly in the infrastructure of smaller and poorer Eastern European countries, where they are financing bridges, tunnels, or taking over commercial harbors, airports. Even in Western Europe, they are rescuing failing companies or acquiring new ones — China has already taken over the electricity grids of Greece, Italy and Portugal.
How can the EU strike back?
Nathalie Loiseau, French Minister of European Affairs, 55, an extremely intelligent woman and a candidate to watch for in the May 26 European elections, wants to be positive and stresses what has been accomplished, “We have gained more in 18 months than in decade on the subject of defense … Germany has joined us on the idea of a common budget for the Euro zone … Poland agrees with France on the PAC (Common Agricultural Policy) … There is no cohesion among the nationalist governments … Austria and Hungary disagree on many topics.”
Business leaders of the MEDEF (Movement of French enterprises) met in February to reassert their economic sovereignty against malicious cyber attacks and industrial espionage, “Being liberal, they say, does not mean being naive.”
On March 4, the French president Emmanuel Macron published a “Letter to the Citizens of the 28 EU countries.” His vision for the “renaissance of the construction of Europe” is consistent with the seminal speech on foreign policy that he gave at the Sorbonne on Sept. 26, 2017, and also with the Aix-la-Chapelle Treaty of Jan. 22, 2019, between France and Germany. Macron advocates a protective Europe with external borders guaranteeing free “Schengen Space,” a strong defense and security treaty, the harmonization of salaries, and protection against cyber attacks during elections.
The reactions of the 28 EU members were favorable, although several of them said that trust is more important than the creation of new institutions.
The attitude of all the member countries of the EU to Brexit has proved that those 27 countries do not, in fact, want to leave Europe. Chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier has so far accomplished the almost impossible in keeping his troops together.
Editor’s Note: This is the opinion of Nicole Prévost Logan.
About the author: Nicole Prévost Logan divides her time between Essex and Paris, spending summers in the former and winters in the latter. She writes a regular column for us from her Paris home where her topics will include politics, economy, social unrest — mostly in France — but also in other European countries. She also covers a variety of art exhibits and the performing arts in Europe. Logan is the author of ‘Forever on the Road: A Franco-American Family’s Thirty Years in the Foreign Service,’ an autobiography of her life as the wife of an overseas diplomat, who lived in 10 foreign countries on three continents. Her experiences during her foreign service life included being in Lebanon when civil war erupted, excavating a medieval city in Moscow and spending a week under house arrest in Guinea.